|
Worthington
Street, Leicester
Worthington
Street is a turn of the century-terraced road with houses fronting
directly on to it. The Highfields area is a diverse population with
a mixture of ethnic groups. There are five streets in parallel between
two heavily trafficked routes; all have been closed to through traffic
except Worthington Street. The street contained 80 terraced houses
and before the work had a peak flow of 130 vehicles per hour along
it.
The objectives
were to redesign the road into an area principally for the relaxation
and enjoyment of the residents, without closing the street to through
traffic, in a 'woonerf' style. The Council did want to deter unnecessary
through traffic and encourage the traffic that did use the street
to travel slowly and carefully. The residents were heavily involved
in all stages of the scheme design. The road was replaced with a
level shared surface, with designated parking spaces, flat-topped
humps and planting. The residents were involved in the selection
of materials and street furniture. The speed was restrained by the
use of flat top humps, lateral shifts designated by planters and
39 coloured parking spaces. The local shop had railings and archways
located outside it and hanging baskets were supplied to people who
agreed to maintain them.
The total cost
was £180,000 including professional fees and renewing the underground
services. There was a successful bid to the Urban Programme grants,
which met a significant part of the budget. There was an attempt
to introduce supporting bylaws to enhance pedestrian status on the
roadway and to reduce speed limits to less than 20 mph, however
this failed. These measures had to be achieved through physical
measures alone.
Two years after
the scheme was finished the City Council undertook a questionnaire
of the residents to appraise the scheme. The response was disappointing,
both in terms of number of responses and the individual responses
to the questions. Three quarters of those who responded thought
that the environment had been improved by the scheme, however there
was a level of dissatisfaction with parking, safety and speed through
the street. The councils 'before and after' surveys do not back
this up, speeds down to an average of 16mph, and the level of traffic
reduced by 55 percent. There have been no road-related accidents
in this street since 1990.
In 1995 the
council received a petition for the removal of the planters in the
streets and the creation of additional parallel to street, parking.
This demand was in tandem with residents observations that car ownership
had doubled in the previous 5 years.
Council car
counts and speed measurements failed to back up the residents views,
they noted that cars were parked illegally in the street even though
there were legal spaces a short distance away. The Director of Environment
and Development recommended that some of the planters were removed
and additional diagonal parking installed.
Summary
Worthington Street makes extensive use of techniques such as shared
surface planters and resolved parking problems, all in consultation
with the residents. Whilst some might see the petition for removing
the planters as a failure of the street, it is actually more positive.
One of the strengths of the Dutch system is this continual re-visiting
and re-designing of the street to cater for changing needs. Leicester
City Council listened to the views of the residents and acted to
ensure their revised needs were met. The traffic management, public
participation and environmental techniques make this scheme the
closest Britain has to a continental Home Zone.
Copyright: Matthew
Bridgestock, Home Zones Good Practice in Britain and Henbury, Bristol
Feasibility Study, Publication date March 2000.
If you are interested
in the full publication, e-mail
Matthew
|